Entry: session 8: critical q&a Jun 8, 2004



Middelaar, L. van (2003) On Logos and Grassroot: The Anti-Globalization Movement Between Morals, Economics and Politics See: http://www.cne.org/pub_pdf?032003_luuk_grasroots.pdf

 

In the end of the text L. van Middelaar offers kind of directions for rewarding relationship among of Western countries and 3rd World, the main idea is that poverty problems could be solved with political will and legal accuracy. What arguments are provided not to include economical (or business) solutions to this relationship?

 

L. van Middelaar quotes Hernando de Soto, who states that for capital transfers to have a positive impact on developing world, a huge political and legal work should be done. Later, de Soto’s claim on perception of working of “capital” is mentioned: capital is so well integrated in the whole system that it has become invisible. On the one hand, these arguments are strong to defend statement that “the way out of poverty lies not in naked money transfers from North to South”[i]. On the other hand, if we presume that the flows of capital have become difficult to pick out from political and legal actions, how can we speak of the businesses coming to the third world after political and legal reforms are done? BTW, the impure relationship between business and politics is one of the reasons why Western power is questioned by anti-globalists and other activists. In my opinion, the terms “politics and law” don’t embrace the notion of “business”. In honest discussions of development the term “money” is inevitable. And this is actually what many streams of anti-globalists deal with, isn’t it?

 

L. van Middelaar speaks that the name “anti-globalisation” doesn’t exactly reflect anti-globalists activities because they’re mostly against to a certain type of globalization (7). What is here common with N. Klein’s book’s name “No Logo”?

  

N. Klein herself mentions limits of brand-based approach towards the problems caused by globalizing capitalism. Many adbusters’ campaigns, such as the one against “Nike” which main idea was to counter “Nike” by selling a kind of “delogoed” shoe called the “Black Spot sneaker” which had a “antilogo”: black spot, which actually could be treated as logo: it’s mark raising up psychological (even ideological could be said) meanings.[ii] However, if we put emphasis that culture jammers and adbusters movements are not against branding as a means of management but against the actions which disobey the human values, then a part of advertisers’ arguments against culture jammers actions would be beat off and further fruitful discussions on the validity of global capitalism actions.   To sum up, both names of activism and of the books convey deeper  message we get by literal translation of the terms.


Lasica, J.D. (2003) Blogs and Journalism Need Each Other (Nieman Reports, Fall 2003)

 

The appearance of “news blogs” simply can be treated as the growing number of information sources. Which field of news reporting is in a greatest need of depolarization of news sources?

 

The content of every news program is much dependent on the information offered my news agencies, especially if we speak of international issues coverage. For instance, “The Associated Press” says that “Depending on whether the story ran on the state, national or international wires, more than a billion people may read, hear or see news”. Researches show that in Lithuanian media main international information sources, especially those of images are Reuters, Interfax and AP, on the radio also BBC, CNN and some Russian on-line papers are quoted what means that news discourse actually depends on a few sources simply because of the high costs of information gathering. Blogging can be treated as at least a small escape from such domination of several international news sources.

 

Does blogging really change the main streams on news reporting?

 

What is biggest challenge for blogging that actually the category of trust in news business is so important that usually only “reliable and respected, well informed” sources are quoted and so far I could scarcely imagine the BBC news’host presenting facts with such the beginning: “as Christopher Allbriton writes in his weblog, ….”, and all news business is a huge inert structure. There are evident threats: first  for mass media structure itself, because it’s mainly built on “time checked” directions of networking, and with media concentration (not the growing variety of sources) they become even more stable sources of profit. Another logical threat is the responsibility for audience: to trust any news “with personality” seems less logical than to trust information from such big businesses as Reuters or AP which are really sensitive about their organizational face and reputation.

 

To sum up, “media mix” rewards from blogging but news reporting itself is effected by globalizing tendencies and is actually quite a conservative field of journalism. This means that it will take some time before weblogs  really effect traditional fields of journalism

 

Not only journalism is changed by blogging activities, but also the blogging culture changes because of journalism. Find an example.

 

“Scotblog” (http://www.bbc.co.uk/scotland/webguide/scotblog/) which is presented as  the weblog of BBC Scotland Interactive, providing links to internet-based items and resources, featuring short executive summary and unique perspective on the web” is an example of highly institutionalized blog.

 

Not speaking much about the idea for BBC to have such blogs, the first visible fact that despite the “news with face” blog readers get quite formal information from reporter Mike (“Scotblog is presently written by a select group of BBC production staff, who are individually identified by their first name beneath each entry”), but you get neither his name nor opinion, though on air programs hosts usually present themselves with names ad surnames.

 

Comments are not posted under the news items, the reason is said to be “because of the BBC's standards on taste and decency, we cannot allow members of the public to publish their comments directly onto one of our sites, but all comments are immediately sent to a repository, where we proof them before publication. We check for comments regularly throughout the working day, and often at weekends too”.

 

So, the form of weblog is used more as a page with extended links for disseminating information from the same news businesses.

 

Gillmor, D. (2003) Moving Toward Participatory Journalism (Nieman Reports, Fall 2003)

 

Why blogging can be treated as distoringt journalism?

 

If you are a journalist dreaming of TV stars’ career to own a blog which reflects your individual voice is a perfect opportunity to express yourself and attract crowds of admirers. If blogging becomes a fashion, all journalists will be expected to have blogs and will be forced to be busy with quite redundant activities, simply take energy from journalists’ which could be used for working his direct job.

 

E.g. if you’re a radio reporter it takes you additional energy top supply your own blog with specially prepared information. Let’s imagine that to have a weblog for a journalist is as important as to drop in talk–shows for politicians. Ironically politics now is more about what is said than what is done. Like for a journalist to say “how I tried to make a good report”. Honest  entries to ones blog could be like this: “today I didn’t find 3 main sources to speak on mine topic but my editors said that my feature should be ready for evening program so I find 3 others, 1 of them knew less than me, another one was very exited about idea to speak on air and spoke so slowly that it took 1 hour to edit his speech later (because actually report could last no longer than 3 minutes…)  But anyway you heard this in the evening program and maybe even find this report very professional….

 

Of course I’m exaggerating. But what I want to say is that blogging technology  can be used in many ways, so it is not panacea against the “cloudiness” of journalism. There are the acts of journalism which won’t be made transparent by journalist’s themselves. Because of the same reason – everyone does mistakes and is not like to admit all of them.


P.S. Journalism studies is my major in Lithuania and I had been working as a reporter for a while. So, my arguments on previous text are influenced by my practical experience. Being a journalist in small country in not too sophisticated technological environment you know not only the contraints common with profession itself (eternal shortage of time, superficialness, dependance on sources etc.) but also reality: what is not seen as a direct source of profit by media bosses in the beginning, later are often simply attached to the traditional activities as an extention (e.g. neither of main Lithuanian dailies is improving their on-line versions of newspapers according to internet technology novelities). That's why I believe that in the nearest future blogging will be used as an extension of journalistic genres more often than treated as the new sort of journalism. 

btw, I hope to "extend" the radio program I'm planning to work in when I go back to Lithuania with blogging affordances :) However, I know that the target audience of this program is not the people who use computers and the scope of benefit will depend not only on my enthusiasm but on reality as well...      

 

Warde, A. Production, Consumption and “Cultural Economy” In: Gay, P. du; Pryke, M. (2002) Cultural Economy (London: Sage Publications)

 

A. Warde shapes his discussion on the basis of R. Williams 3 definitions of culture. The author doesn’t see much coterminous with the culture(i) definition and the discussion on information society.  Is this position convincing?

 

Even though I agree with authors’ choice to use (i) and (ii) definitions of culture in the discussion on “cultural economies”, I would say that the whole context of the discussion obviously includes the “general intellectual, spiritual and aesthetic development”, “the fruits of civilization”. E.g., the growth in leisure time related industries (or here we could say culture (iii) businesses depend much on technological advances embodied in new capital equipment[iii], the present changes of cultural economies which could be called the moving towards participatory culture is correlated with the horizons of thinking on businesses widened by IT technologies.  So I don’t find the reason to tell that the culture (i) definition is vaguely related to information society. The author even contradicts himself later saying that intellectual properties are becoming more important inputs to production.      



[i] P.41

[ii] http://slate.msn.com/id/2091260/#ContinueArticle

[iii] Vogel, H. (2001) Economic Perspectives in: Entertainment Industry Economics – A Guide For Financial Analysis - Cambridge University Press, 5th edition

 



   1 comments

miglena
August 25, 2005   05:31 PM PDT
 
good page http://www.g888.com

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments